[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15597838#comment-15597838
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on LANG-1269:
--------------------------------------
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/198
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/8459485)
Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 93.57% when pulling
**436d2801899827a2651b8b44d680aaf9e17acca7 on
PascalSchumacher:jarowinklerdistance_name** into
**8274993e293a79fc75829df398233915a6387a4b on apache:master**.
> Wrong name or result of StringUtils::getJaroWinklerDistance
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-1269
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1269
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.3, 3.4
> Reporter: Jan Martin Keil
> Assignee: Bruno P. Kinoshita
> Priority: Minor
>
> The name of the method StringUtils::getJaroWinklerDistance is misleading.
> Currently for equal strings {{1}} is returned, for completely different
> strings {{0}} is returned. That is a measure of similarity, not of a
> distance. A distance must be {{0}} for equal strings. I read on the issues
> LANG-591 and LANG-944, that it was decided to have a similar name to
> StringUtils::getLevenshteinDistance, but that requires also the change of the
> methods result.
> Could you please (1) rename the method to
> StringUtils::getJaroWinklerSimilarity or (2) change the method to return {{1
> - currentResult}}?
> First option has the disadvantage to lose the similar naming of the similar
> methods, second option implies the risk to unnoticed introduce bugs in
> depending code. So I think it is preferable to use the first option.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
