[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13835998#comment-13835998
]
Maurizio Cucchiara edited comment on LANG-871 at 1/26/15 2:03 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
[~bayard],
though I agree with you, the truth is that there are many
frameworks/applications which rely on escape* methods in terms of security.
[~aree] An example would be appreciated.
was (Author: maurizio.cucchiara):
[~bayard],
thought I agree with you, the truth is that there are many
framework/application which rely on escape* methods in terms of security.
[~aree] An input example would be appreciated.
> [XSS] Possible attacks through StringEscapeUtils.escapeEcmaScript?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-871
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-871
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: lang.*
> Affects Versions: 3.1
> Reporter: Andy Reek
> Labels: XSS
> Fix For: Discussion
>
>
> org.apache.commons.lang3.StringEscapeUtils.escapeEcmaScript does the escape
> via a prefixed '\' on all characters which must be escaped. I am not sure if
> this is really secure, if am looking at the comments on
> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/XSS_(Cross_Site_Scripting)_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet#RULE_.233_-_JavaScript_Escape_Before_Inserting_Untrusted_Data_into_JavaScript_Data_Values.
> They say it is possible to do an attack by escape the escape. I tested this
> with the string '\"' and the output was '\\\"'. Is this really
> ecma-/java-script secure? Or is it better to use the implementation used by
> OWASP?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
