[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16428941#comment-16428941
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10315:
---------------------------------------------
lzh3636 closed pull request #2547: CLOUDSTACK-10315 Inconsistent debugging info
in catch block
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2547
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a foreign pull request (from a fork), the diff is supplied
below (as it won't show otherwise due to GitHub magic):
diff --git
a/api/src/main/java/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/firewall/CreatePortForwardingRuleCmd.java
b/api/src/main/java/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/firewall/CreatePortForwardingRuleCmd.java
index ea0cb00301a..d4ea9a515a3 100644
---
a/api/src/main/java/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/firewall/CreatePortForwardingRuleCmd.java
+++
b/api/src/main/java/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/firewall/CreatePortForwardingRuleCmd.java
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ public void create() {
setEntityId(result.getId());
setEntityUuid(result.getUuid());
} catch (NetworkRuleConflictException ex) {
- s_logger.info("Network rule conflict: ", ex);
+ s_logger.info("Network rule conflict: " + ex.getMessage());
s_logger.trace("Network Rule Conflict: ", ex);
throw new
ServerApiException(ApiErrorCode.NETWORK_RULE_CONFLICT_ERROR, ex.getMessage());
}
diff --git
a/plugins/hypervisors/simulator/src/main/java/com/cloud/ha/SimulatorFencer.java
b/plugins/hypervisors/simulator/src/main/java/com/cloud/ha/SimulatorFencer.java
index 86c28715e0b..c776edfde35 100644
---
a/plugins/hypervisors/simulator/src/main/java/com/cloud/ha/SimulatorFencer.java
+++
b/plugins/hypervisors/simulator/src/main/java/com/cloud/ha/SimulatorFencer.java
@@ -90,12 +90,12 @@ public Boolean fenceOff(VirtualMachine vm, Host host) {
answer = (FenceAnswer)_agentMgr.send(h.getId(), fence);
} catch (AgentUnavailableException e) {
if (s_logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
- s_logger.debug("Moving on to the next host because " +
h.toString() + " is unavailable");
+ s_logger.debug("Moving on to the next host because " +
h.toString() + " is unavailable", e);
}
continue;
} catch (OperationTimedoutException e) {
if (s_logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
- s_logger.debug("Moving on to the next host because " +
h.toString() + " is unavailable");
+ s_logger.debug("Moving on to the next host because " +
h.toString() + " is unavailable", e);
}
continue;
}
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Inconsistent debugging info in catch block
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-10315
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10315
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Zhenhao Li
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: easyfix
> Attachments: image-2018-03-05-09-59-19-369.png,
> image-2018-03-05-10-14-00-552.png, image-2018-03-05-10-14-25-802.png,
> image-2018-03-26-17-45-44-489.png
>
>
> We found that some logging statements have same log message, but one of them
> has stack trace info, the other one of them doesn't have. Maybe a possible
> reason is that they are code clone, developers changed one of them(add stack
> trace info) but forgot to change the other one. Here's the details of those
> logging statements we found:
>
> 1.*"Moving on to the next host because " + h.toString() + " is unavailable"*,
> _com.cloud.hypervisor.ovm3.resources.Ovm3FenceBuilder.*fenceOff()*,_
> _com.cloud.ha.SimulatorFencer.*fenceOff()*_,
> There are two identical log messages in these two places, the previous one
> logged stack trace:
> !image-2018-03-26-17-45-44-489.png!
> But the latter one did not:
> !image-2018-03-05-09-59-19-369.png!
> We can see that they are in different type of catch block, but when checking
> the logs they generated, maybe it's impossible to know the difference of them
> without stack trace. So maybe the stack traces info should also be added here?
>
> 2.*"Network rule Conflict"*
> _org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.firewall.CreatePortForwardingRuleCmd.*create()*,_
> _org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.firewall.CreateFirewallRuleCmd.*create()*_
>
> The previous one has these two logging statements:
> s_logger.info("Network rule conflict: ", ex);
> s_logger.trace("Network Rule Conflict: ", ex);
>
> Comparing to the latter one which contains:
> s_logger.info("Network rule conflict: " + ex.getMessage());
> s_logger.trace("Network Rule Conflict: ", ex);
> Maybe it's better to have consistent exception handling here?
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
