[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16365265#comment-16365265
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10282:
---------------------------------------------

rhtyd closed pull request #2450: CLOUDSTACK-10282: firewall rules operation 
should be done with ip6tab…
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2450
 
 
   

This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:

As this is a foreign pull request (from a fork), the diff is supplied
below (as it won't show otherwise due to GitHub magic):

diff --git a/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/setup/postinit.sh 
b/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/setup/postinit.sh
index d29203f71c2..9da5c7a75fa 100755
--- a/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/setup/postinit.sh
+++ b/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/setup/postinit.sh
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ fi
 ipv6="/etc/iptables/rules.v6"
 if [ -e $ipv6 ]
 then
-   iptables-restore < $ipv6
+   ip6tables-restore < $ipv6
 fi
 
 date > /var/cache/cloud/boot_up_done


 

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> SystemVM - filrewall rules incorrect
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-10282
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10282
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: SystemVM
>            Reporter: Marc-Aurèle Brothier
>            Priority: Major
>
> The current state of the firewall on the systemVMs let all packets come in 
> due to the overwrite of the ipv6 rules on the ipv4.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to