[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15976423#comment-15976423
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-8239:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Commit 5c476492b109b0179c9a0903e04efe26c3daf928 in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~nathanejohnson]
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=5c47649 ]

CLOUDSTACK-8239 - Adding support for virtio-scsi on KVM hosts

This adds support for virtio-scsi on KVM hosts, either
for guests that are associated with a new os_type of 'Other PV Virtio-SCSI 
(64-bit)',
or when a VM or template is regstered with a detail parameter 
rootDiskController=scsi.

Update cloudstack add template dialog to allow for selecting rootDiskController 
with KVM

Update cloudstack kvm virtio-scsi to enable discard=unmap


> Add support for VirtIO-SCSI for KVM hypervisors
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8239
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8239
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: KVM, Storage Controller
>    Affects Versions: 4.6.0
>         Environment: KVM
>            Reporter: Andrei Mikhailovsky
>            Assignee: Wido den Hollander
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: ceph, gsoc2017, kvm, libvirt, rbd, storage_drivers, 
> virtio
>             Fix For: Future
>
>
> It would be nice to have support for virtio-scsi for KVM hypervisors.
> The reason for using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk would be increasing 
> the number of devices you can attach to a vm, have ability to use discard and 
> reclaim unused blocks from the backend storage like ceph rbd. There are also 
> talks about having a greater performance advantage as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to