[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15887856#comment-15887856
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9782:
--------------------------------------------
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960
@abhinandanprateek If you refer to the discussion on dev@
https://goo.gl/cU8RuX, @rhtyd proposed it as a generic HA framework for any
resources (and not limited to VM). Now if it just a replacement of the existing
VM-HA framework then we need to discuss the benefits it provides in more detail
compared to the existing one. I have already made some specific comments on the
justifications provided in favour of a new framework.
> Host HA
> -------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9782
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9782
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Rohit Yadav
> Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> Fix For: Future, 4.11.0.0
>
>
> CloudStack lacks a way to reliably fence a host, the idea of the host-ha
> feature is to provide a general purpose HA framework and implementation
> specific for hypervisor that can use additional mechanism such as OOBM (ipmi
> based power management) to reliably investigate, recover and fencing a host.
> This feature can handle scenarios associated with server crash issues and
> reliable fencing of hosts and HA of VM.
> FS: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Host+HA
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
