[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15316598#comment-15316598
 ] 

Wido den Hollander commented on CLOUDSTACK-9406:
------------------------------------------------

Hi! You can take this question to the users mailinglist from CloudStack which 
can be found here: http://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html

> Enable IPv6 Link-Local in cloud0 interface in System VMs
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9406
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9406
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: KVM, SystemVM
>            Reporter: Wido den Hollander
>              Labels: ipv6, link-local, systemvm
>
> Currently a 169.254.0.0/16 address is used for communication between the 
> (KVM) hypervisor and a System VM.
> The address is provided through a socket to the SSVM on startup.
> This adds additional complexity since such an address needs to be recorded in 
> the database.
> IPv6 provides the Link-Local address starting with fe80:: where it is 
> calculated based on the MAC-address.
> This address could be used to communicate with the SSVM without any prior 
> communication with it. The Hypervisor knows the MAC address of the SSVM and 
> thus it knows which address the SSVM will obtain.
> On this address a provisioning daemon could run instead of the current 'patch 
> via socket' scripts.
> Over this address the SSVM could even expose a complete REST-full API which 
> can be used to talk to the SSVM.
> Using the IPv6 link-local address would be the first step to IPv6 in the SSVM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to