[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-12878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16648842#comment-16648842
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CAMEL-12878:
----------------------------------------

aldettinger commented on issue #2564: CAMEL-12878: camel-jpa: Allow for passing 
named-query parameters via message header
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2564#issuecomment-429525176
 
 
   I'm just wondering whether it's ok use a message header in this case. If we 
are ok with that, the implementation looks goods to me.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> camel-jpa: Allow for passing named-query parameters via message header and/or 
> body
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-12878
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-12878
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-jpa
>    Affects Versions: 2.22.1
>            Reporter: Jochen Cordes
>            Assignee: Dmitry Volodin
>            Priority: Major
>
> Right now camel-jpa allows for passing parameters to named-queries via a bean 
> in the registry. For ease of use it should also be possible to pass 
> parameters via message header and/or body (i.e. using a HashMap and 
> key/values for parameter-name and parameter-value).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to