[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-24807:
--------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 4.23.0
                       (was: 4.x)

> camel-yaml-dsl - Deprecate Pipe (aka KameletBinding) support
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-24807
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24807
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-yaml-dsl
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.23.0
>
>
> The YAML DSL can load Kubernetes-style {{kind: Pipe}} (formerly 
> {{KameletBinding}}) files from Camel K, converting 
> {{source}}/{{sink}}/{{steps}} and the Pipe {{errorHandler}} into a regular 
> route at load time ({{YamlRoutesBuilderLoader.preConfigurePipe}}, the 
> {{*.pipe.yaml}} extension).
> This is a Camel K construct rather than a Camel feature. A plain YAML route 
> is more expressive (any EIP, multiple routes per file, error handling, route 
> configuration), is what the tooling, the catalog, the validator and the AI 
> tools work on, and is what the documentation teaches. Keeping a second, more 
> limited way of writing the same thing costs maintenance for little gain.
> Deprecate Pipe support in the YAML DSL in 4.x so it can be removed in the 
> next major:
> * log a deprecation WARN when a Pipe file is loaded, pointing to writing a 
> plain route instead
> * mark the Pipe handling in {{YamlRoutesBuilderLoader}} and the {{pipe.yaml}} 
> extension as deprecated
> * document the deprecation in the YAML DSL page and in the upgrade guide, 
> with an example of the equivalent route
> * camel-jbang: the {{init}} Pipe template ({{init-pipe.yaml.ftl}}, 
> {{pipe.yaml.tmpl}}) and the {{bind}} command follow CAMEL-21521
> Related: CAMEL-21521 (remove the {{camel bind}} command).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to