[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-20027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17942142#comment-17942142
 ] 

Anirudh Prakash commented on CAMEL-20027:
-----------------------------------------

[~davsclaus] what should the interaction between minWaitTime and minAge be 
like? Should the wait time be applied after the minAge?

> camel-file - Read lock changed - Add option for minWaitTime
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-20027
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-20027
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-file
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> The changed that causes some problems has been reverted. See CAMEL-20023.
> For users that want the "new broken behaviour" we could have a new option to 
> set a minimum-wait-time.
> This can be needed for users that copy files with preserve old timestamp, and 
> the copy operation is slow and still in progress.
> Then the minimum-wait-time can be used to keep cycling and detecting file 
> changes (size) as the timestamp is preserved and stay constant.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to