[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-21656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Raymond updated CAMEL-21656:
----------------------------
    Attachment: first_integration.xml
                second_integration.xml
                third_integration.xml

> camel-jms - Multiple routes with direct/activemq and recipientlist returns 
> unexpected result
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-21656
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-21656
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: camel-jms
>    Affects Versions: 4.9.0
>            Reporter: Raymond
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.8.4, 4.10.0
>
>         Attachments: first_integration-1.xml, first_integration.xml, 
> main-xml2.zip, second_integration-1.xml, second_integration.xml, 
> third_integration-1.xml, third_integration.xml
>
>
> I have a customer that upgraded from an old Camel version (2.23) to 4.9.0 
> where the Camel 4 route returned an unexpected result. It's a bit of an 
> edge/curious case. 
> It was part of a bigger route, but I tried to create a minimal example to 
> reproduce the issue.
> The following routes:
> {code:java}
> <routes>
>  <route id="1">
>     <from uri="jetty-nossl:http://0.0.0.0:9000/test"/>
>     <step id="1">
>        <to uri="activemq:2"/>
>     </step>
>  </route>
>  <route id="2">
>     <from uri="activemq:2"/>
>     <step id="2">
>        <to uri="direct:3"/>
>        <to uri="activemq:log?exchangePattern=InOnly&amp;timeToLive=86400000"/>
>     </step>
>  </route>
>  <route id="3">
>     <from uri="direct:3"/>
>     <step id="3">
>        <multicast>
>           <to uri="direct:4a?exchangePattern=InOut"/>
>           <to uri="direct:4b?exchangePattern=InOut"/>
>        </multicast>
>     </step>
>  </route>
>  <route id="4a">
>     <from uri="direct:4a"/>
>     <step id="4a">
>        <setBody>
>           <constant>a</constant>
>        </setBody>        
>        <to 
> uri="activemq:log?exchangePattern=InOnly&amp;timeToLive=86400000"/>           
>          </step>
>  </route>
>  <route id="4b">
>     <from uri="direct:4b"/>
>     <step id="4b">
>        <setBody>
>           <constant>b</constant>
>        </setBody>
>     </step>
>  </route>
>  <route id="log">
>     <from uri="activemq:log"/>
>     <step id="log">
>        <to uri="log:mylog"/>
>     </step>
>  </route>
> </routes> {code}
> returns the result: a
> expected result: b
> The expected result can be shown by changing small things in the route. For 
> example:
> 1. Change the endpoint "activemq:2" to "direct:2"
> 2. Remove this line from route 2:
> <to uri="activemq:log?exchangePattern=InOnly&amp;timeToLive=86400000"/>
> 3. Remove one of the parameters in route 4a of this line:
>  <to uri="activemq:log?exchangePattern=InOnly&amp;timeToLive=86400000"/> 
> For example, just by removing the timeToLive option returns the expected 
> result.
> ----------------------------
> With all of these small changes, the expected result 'b' returns. Can you 
> check why this particular combination produces the unexpected result?
> Note: I used ActiveMQ 6.1.5 for testing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to