[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18118886#comment-18118886
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-7820:
--------------------------------------

Yes, I guess when you don't write a test, things break. :)

If you need this functionality in Ignite, please contribute a fix. The fix 
should include a test, so that this doesn't break again.

> nonReservedKeywordsToRemove in parser config.fmpp is documented but never 
> consumed by Parser.jj
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-7820
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7820
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Iurii Gerzhedovich
>            Priority: Major
>
> default_config.fmpp documents nonReservedKeywordsToRemove as:
>  # List of non-reserved keywords to remove;
>  # items in this list become reserved.
> nonReservedKeywordsToRemove: [
> ]
> This implies a sub-parser can list a keyword here to make it reserved even 
> though Calcite's own default_config.fmpp treats it as non-reserved. However, 
> core/src/main/codegen/templates/Parser.jj never reads this field. The only 
> place the non-reserved keyword set is assembled is:
> <#list (parser.nonReservedKeywords!default.parser.nonReservedKeywords) + 
> (parser.nonReservedKeywordsToAdd!default.parser.nonReservedKeywordsToAdd) as 
> keyword>
> (repeated 3 times, for NonReservedKeyWord0of3/1of3/2of3). There is no 
> reference to nonReservedKeywordsToRemove anywhere in Parser.jj, so setting it 
> in a sub-parser's config.fmpp has zero effect on the generated grammar — the 
> keyword remains non-reserved.
> History: the field was introduced (as an empty list, alongside 
> nonReservedKeywordsToAdd) in commit 05a086bc6 ("Re-format and re-organize 
> config.fmpp files...", Oct 2019) and carried through CALCITE-4238 (Sep 2020, 
> the commit that added the !default... fallback for 
> nonReservedKeywords/nonReservedKeywordsToAdd) without ever being wired in. It 
> appears to have never been exercised by any sub-parser (core's own 
> default_config.fmpp keeps it empty too).
> Reproduction:
> 1. In any Calcite-based parser module, add a word that's in 
> default_config.fmpp's nonReservedKeywords (e.g. "ADD") to your own 
> config.fmpp's nonReservedKeywordsToRemove.
> 2. Regenerate the parser (generateFmppSources/generateParser).
> 3. The word still parses as a non-reserved identifier — isReservedWord("ADD") 
> on the generated SqlAbstractParserImpl.Metadata still returns false.
> Suggested fix: either wire nonReservedKeywordsToRemove into the <#list ...> 
> expressions in Parser.jj (subtract it from the combined list), or remove the 
> field and its documentation from default_config.fmpp if it's intentionally 
> unsupported, to stop misleading downstream parser authors.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to