[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17934042#comment-17934042
 ] 

Ian Bertolacci commented on CALCITE-3428:
-----------------------------------------

[~julianhyde] We opened CALCITE-6882

> Refine RelMdColumnUniqueness for Filter by considering constant columns
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3428
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3428
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jin Xing
>            Assignee: Jin Xing
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.22.0
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> AggregateRemoveRule fails to remove the top Aggregate for below SQL
> {code:java}
> select mgr, sum(sum_sal)
> from
>  (select mgr, deptno, sum(sal) sum_sal
>  from sales.emp
>  group by mgr, deptno)
> where deptno=100
> group by mgr
> {code}
> The reason is that RelMdColumnUniqueness doesn't take the filtering condition 
> into consideration when checking uniqueness of columns. 
> This PR proposes to refine RelMdColumnUniqueness for Filter, thus to 
> strengthen AggregateRemoveRule.
> Resolving this Jira will help a lot for CALCITE-3334 by removing the 
> redundant compensation Aggregate when doing materialization matching



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to