[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17628024#comment-17628024
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-5352:
--------------------------------------
It's reasonable that Calcite should support syntax like the following examples,
which are valid in Postgres:
{code}
date_part('hour', timestamp '2001-02-16 20:38:40')
date_part('month', interval '2:3' year to month)
date_trunc('hour', timestamp '2001-02-16 20:38:40')
{code}
After CALCITE-5155 (which is almost ready) this should be an easier fix,
because we now encode the time frame argument as an identifier.
Also related is CALCITE-5363 (move DATE_PART to core parser), but this case
could happen before or after.
> Babel parser does not recognize character literal with DATE_PART function
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-5352
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5352
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: carton.swing
> Priority: Major
>
> While using babel parser(calcite-babel's SqlBabelParserImpl) to parse
> PostgreSQL syntax:
> {code:java}
> planner.parse("SELECT DATE_PART('week', TIMESTAMP '2022-10-31')"){code}
> it will throws exception.
> But if I use:
> {code:java}
> planner.parse("SELECT DATE_PART(week, TIMESTAMP '2022-10-31')"){code}
> the parser works well.
>
> However, the former syntax, which is a quote-string, is correct according to
> : [https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/functions-datetime.html]
> |Note that here the {{field}} parameter needs to be a string value, not a
> name. The valid field names for {{date_part}} are the same as for
> {{{}extract{}}}.
> SELECT date_part('day', TIMESTAMP '2001-02-16 20:38:40');|
> The first argument should be a quote string instead of a TimeUnit token.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)