[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17371499#comment-17371499
]
Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-2322:
--------------------------------------------
"fetch_row_count" implies that Avatica would **always** use the given row
count. That is too restrictive, and it creates ambiguities: "what if I specify
fetch_row_count both at connection and at the statement level?"
"default_fetch_row_count" makes perfect sense for the connection property: it
tells the connection which value to start with, and then the implementation
should be free to adjust it.
> Add fetch size support to connection url and JDBC statement
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2322
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2322
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: avatica, core
> Affects Versions: 1.11.0
> Reporter: Kevin Minder
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 2h 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently the remote driver defaults to hard coded fetch size of 100 rows.
> When a connection is operating in HTTP mode having such a small fetch size
> can add enormous overhead. This is especially true if TLS connections are
> used and made worse if each connection flows throw multiple proxies.
> Consider that 100K rows returned 100 rows at a time will make 1K HTTP POST
> requests. One might say that nobody should ever do that but some tools like
> Spotfire may end up doing this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
