[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16754127#comment-16754127
]
Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-2223:
--------------------------------------------
[~vvysotskyi], the cycle there is caused by
{code:java} public ProjectSetOpTransposeRule(
PushProjector.ExprCondition preserveExprCondition,
RelBuilderFactory relBuilderFactory) {
super(
operand(
LogicalProject.class,
operand(SetOp.class, any())),
{code}
The problem is it flips LogicalProject with DrillSetOp which is a bit weird.
I'm not sure regarding the details, however I think it makes sense to verify
that Project and SetOp have the same convention.
At the end of the day, it's not that trivial to flip JdbcUnion vs DrillProject.
I've tested {{call.rel(0).getConvention() == call.rel(1).getConvention()}} in
{{matches}}, and it heals {{TestUnionAll.testUnionAllInWith}}
[~julianhyde], what do you think if we limit ProjectSetOpTransposeRule /
FilterSetOpTransposeRule to relations of the same convention only?
> ProjectMergeRule is infinitely matched when is applied after
> ProjectReduceExpressionsRule
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2223
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2223
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments:
> TestLimitWithExchanges_testPushLimitPastUnionExchange.png, heap_overview.png,
> provenance_contents.png
>
>
> For queries like this:
> {code:sql}
> select t1.f from (select cast(f as int) f, f from (select cast(f as int) f
> from (values('1')) t(f))) as t1
> {code}
> OOM is thrown when {{ProjectMergeRule}} is applied before applying
> {{ProjectReduceExpressionsRule}} in VolcanoPlanner.
> A simple test to reproduce this issue (in {{RelOptRulesTest}}):
> {code:java}
> @Test public void testOomProjectMergeRule() {
> RelBuilder relBuilder =
> RelBuilder.create(RelBuilderTest.config().build());
> RelNode relNode = relBuilder
> .values(new String[]{"f"}, "1")
> .project(
> relBuilder.alias(
> relBuilder.cast(relBuilder.field(0), SqlTypeName.INTEGER),
> "f"))
> .project(
> relBuilder.alias(
> relBuilder.cast(relBuilder.field(0), SqlTypeName.INTEGER),
> "f0"),
> relBuilder.alias(relBuilder.field(0), "f"))
> .project(
> relBuilder.alias(relBuilder.field(0), "f"))
> .build();
> RelOptPlanner planner = relNode.getCluster().getPlanner();
> RuleSet ruleSet =
> RuleSets.ofList(
> ReduceExpressionsRule.PROJECT_INSTANCE,
> new ProjectMergeRuleWithLongerName(),
> EnumerableRules.ENUMERABLE_PROJECT_RULE,
> EnumerableRules.ENUMERABLE_VALUES_RULE);
> Program program = Programs.of(ruleSet);
> RelTraitSet toTraits =
> relNode.getCluster().traitSet()
> .replace(0, EnumerableConvention.INSTANCE);
> RelNode output = program.run(planner, relNode, toTraits,
> ImmutableList.<RelOptMaterialization>of(),
> ImmutableList.<RelOptLattice>of());
> // check for output
> }
> /**
> * ProjectMergeRule inheritor which has
> * class name greater than ProjectReduceExpressionsRule class name
> (String.compareTo()).
> *
> * It is needed for RuleQueue.popMatch() method
> * to apply this rule before ProjectReduceExpressionsRule.
> */
> private static class ProjectMergeRuleWithLongerName extends
> ProjectMergeRule {
> public ProjectMergeRuleWithLongerName() {
> super(true, RelFactories.LOGICAL_BUILDER);
> }
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
