[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-14244?focusedWorklogId=753407&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-753407
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-14244:
-----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 06/Apr/22 13:53
            Start Date: 06/Apr/22 13:53
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: steveniemitz commented on PR #17262:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/17262#issuecomment-1090300669

   > > On the surface the fix looks pretty easy, just adding a watermark hold 
in DoFnOperator for processing time timers as it does for event time ones (and 
clearing them as well).
   > 
   > Yes, it actually should be about removing several checks for EVENT_TIME 
time domain. And adding test to verify it works. Could you do a tracking JIRA 
for that?
   
   Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-14265




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 753407)
    Time Spent: 4.5h  (was: 4h 20m)

> Processing time timers should use outputTimestamp rather than input watermark 
> for their timestamp
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-14244
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-14244
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: runner-core, sdk-java-core
>            Reporter: Steve Niemitz
>            Assignee: Steve Niemitz
>            Priority: P1
>          Time Spent: 4.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently processing time timers ignore the outputTimestamp and instead use 
> the input watermark at the time they fire.  This is wrong because the input 
> watermark can have advanced arbitrarily far past the actual output timestamp 
> when it fires.
> The correct behavior should be to instead use the outputTimestamp the timer 
> was configured to fire with.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to