Hi Fernando,
----- Original Message ----- > From: Fernando Gont <[email protected]> > To: Mark ZZZ Smith <[email protected]> > Cc: Ole Troan <[email protected]>; 6man WG <[email protected]>; > "[email protected] Chairs" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, 23 August 2013 7:58 AM > Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-12> > > On 08/19/2013 08:19 AM, Mark ZZZ Smith wrote: >> >> Going by the title, it seems my comment was missed about not implying >> that this address generation technique is limited to SLAAC slack >> scenarios, but could be useful with any address configuration method >> (i.e, SLAAC, DHCPv6, static, +future.) There seemed to be some >> support for decoupling the concepts of address generation from >> address configuration. > > How about something like: > > "While the method specified in this document is meant to be used with > SLAAC, this doesn not preclude the same algorithm from being used with > other address configuration mechanisms, such as DHCPv6 or static address > confguration" > > at the end of Section 1, right before the "terminology" paragraph? > Happy with that. Regards, Mark. > Thanks! > > Cheers, > -- > Fernando Gont > SI6 Networks > e-mail: [email protected] > PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
