> On 28. Jan 2017, at 14:54, Jeroen Massar <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2017-01-28 13:51, Bajpai, Vaibhav wrote: > >> Here is a list of top 20 countries that have a large v6 user-base [*] but are >> underrepresented by RIPE Atlas due to less number of deployed dual-stacked >> probes. Consider hosting a dual-stacked probe in these regions to help remove >> the region-based bias that v6 studies using RIPE Atlas may otherwise have: >> >> Full paper available here: http://goo.gl/hWGveA (§4) >> >> +----+------------+-----------| >> | CC | v6 Users | v6 Probes | >> |-----+----+------------+-----------| >> | 01 | BE | 56.48 % | 2.82 % | >> | 02 | LU | 35.23 % | 0.61 % | >> | 03 | GR | 33.66 % | 1.39 % | >> | 04 | CH | 33.48 % | 3.82 % | > > Would be useful to detail which ASNs these users are supposed to live in > and state if that ASN has probes or not... > > Or otherwise said: instead of doing per-country, you might just want to > single out the ASNs where you are "missing" probes…
Yes, paper (see §5) touches on this bit. Here is the complete list of _dual-stacked_ RIPE Atlas probes by ASN: http://goo.gl/bR5JEd. In order to redo the delta comparison I would need v6 user population numbers by ASN; I am not sure if this data is publicly available. -- Vaibhav > One approach, especially in Europe and the rest of RIPE NCC country: ask > every LIR / ASN to run at least a probe (and not from their datacenter, > but from a enduser connection ;) ) > > Greets, > Jeroen -------------------------- Vaibhav Bajpai www.vaibhavbajpai.com Postdoctoral Researcher TU Munich, Germany --------------------------
