I’ve promised an article to RIPE and APNIC … will work on it once I’ve the Korean data … hopefully in a couple of weeks …
If somebody can help to disseminate the survey among Korean ISPs, please, let me know! In case someone in this list still didn’t responded, here is the link: http://survey.consulintel.es/index.php/175122 Regards, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: Tim Chown <[email protected]> Responder a: <[email protected]> Fecha: martes, 20 de septiembre de 2016, 15:55 Para: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> CC: Benedikt Stockebrand <[email protected]>, IPv6 Ops list <[email protected]>, "Anfinsen, Ragnar" <[email protected]> Asunto: Re: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll Hi, Thanks Jordi. And yes, hindsight is always easy! It would be nice to have a survey report document online for anyone to read, to complement various powerpoint decks you’ve used. Amazing to get such a large response - well done :) Tim > On 20 Sep 2016, at 14:49, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, didn’t included anything about security, unfortunately (now I realize having missed it !) I will consider upgrading the actual questions or making a specific one related to security … > > I’ve got already over 1.100 responses, and I’m waiting for Korean ISPs to start responding … I think is the only country which didn’t responded at all. > > I did a quick presentation about the data both in the last v6ops and IEPG meetings. Will do a new presentation at the next LACNIC meeting and hopefully at the next RIPE one. > > Regards, > Jordi > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: <[email protected]> en nombre de Tim Chown <[email protected]> > Responder a: <[email protected]> > Fecha: martes, 20 de septiembre de 2016, 14:50 > Para: Benedikt Stockebrand <[email protected]>, Jordi Palet Martinez <[email protected]> > CC: IPv6 Ops list <[email protected]>, "Anfinsen, Ragnar" <[email protected]> > Asunto: Re: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll > > Hi, > > Was this one of the questions asked in Jordi’s survey? I’m not sure I’ve seen the results published as yet, but he got a fantastic level of response (over 200 iirc)… Jordi? :) > > Tim > >> On 20 Sep 2016, at 13:44, Benedikt Stockebrand <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Ragnar and list, >> >> as far as I can tell, little has changed at least in Germany since our >> last discussion on this (except that I've since sobered up again:-) >> >> I guess you won't be surprised that I still share the same opinion as >> Ted:-) >> >> So far all I've consciously seen on consumer CPEs is "per default, allow >> all outbound, block all inbound". I'm not sure if there are any ultra >> cheap CPEs out that don't even let users configure inbound rules, but >> I've never had the need to deal with anything like that. >> >> However, one rather interesting thing has changed here: Since August >> this year, ISPs can by law no longer force their customers in Germany to >> use the CPE they provide. The implications here are yet to appear, but >> one possible effect might be that the ISPs move away from the >> all-features-you-never-wanted-plus-some-extra CPEs they so far forced on >> their customers to minimalistic devices they can just manage via TR-069 >> or similar (reaching a setup similar ot the old NT1/NT2 split with ISDN >> in Europe), eventually leaving the filtering to the end user again. >> >> With business customers the range obviously goes from "consumer grade is >> good enough so why use anything else" for small businesses to dark fiber >> for customers running their own AS. >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Benedikt >> >> -- >> Benedikt Stockebrand, Stepladder IT Training+Consulting >> Dipl.-Inform. http://www.stepladder-it.com/ >> >> Business Grade IPv6 --- Consulting, Training, Projects >> >> BIVBlog---Benedikt's IT Video Blog: http://www.stepladder-it.com/bivblog/ >> > > > > > >
