> On 28 Apr 2016, at 06:37, Ted Mittelstaedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 4/27/2016 12:37 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> Ted Mittelstaedt<[email protected]> writes: >>> On 4/26/2016 1:37 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote: >>>> But let's face it: name-server config is not something that interests a >>>> large group of end users. Any feature which is not part of the default >>>> OS installation is not worth considering at all. >>> >>> is that a fact? I suppose you don't use SSH then to access your >>> command line servers and devices.<eyeroll> >> >> I meant to imply a name-server config context. I.e. > > Understood. I didn't mean to imply that ISP's should tell > end users to run RDNSS on Windows. But I did want to dispel any > talk that it was impossible.
Well, RDNSS is clearly possible on Windows. Just like DHCPv6 support is possible on Android. Meanwhile neither has happened, and this religious war hurts practical deployment. Will this madness ever end? Tim
