Thus wrote Gert Doering ([email protected]):
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 02:37:09PM -0800, Erik Kline wrote:
> > Sure this potential Data Retention Directive will not be IPv6-specific
> > and somehow exempt IPv4?
>
> I read the original concern as "if they force DR on us, and we run a
> CGN, it will not be possible / too expensive / ... to log the NAT
> mappings that the CGN did".
Also, expecting that politicians will let practical considerations get
in the way of their desires may be overly optimistic.
regards,
spz
--
[email protected] (S.P.Zeidler)
