Is it related to the paranoid option of blocking all inbound traffic? To mimick NAT44 ?
-éric On 12/02/15 14:00, "Thomas Schäfer" <[email protected]> wrote: >Am 12.02.2015 um 13:40 schrieb [email protected]: >>> This might be so in Norway. In German customer portals the gamers >>>mostly >>> demand ipv4 (public ipv4 address to their home) instead of DS-Lite. >>>They >>> have already native IPv6 but avm was forced to allow "teredo" over DS >>> and DS-lite - because xbox has problems with native IPv6. >>> >>> xbox is no good example for *wanting* IPv6. >> >> Could you elaborate on the IPv6 issues for xbox? I was under the >>impresion >> that xbox works well with IPv6. > >It was last spring/summer. You can find it also in the archive of this >list. > >In short: > >xbox did not work at several (IPv6) providers. Some of them have patched >their routers and found a solution with Microsoft (comcast). >In other parts of the world, *the solution* was to allow teredo at an >IPv6-Access. >Because I don't own a xbox I haven't sniffed the network behaviour, but >I observe some costumer portals (e.g. Kabel Deutschland/Vodafone) and >there are still problems, often related to IPv6. (can have other reasons >too, like instability at all, Firewalls or something else) > > >Thomas >
