Éric Vyncke via Datatracker writes: > Just two comments on "The working group will work on documents to > help that. One such tool could be the esp-ping protocol." > > 1) should there be a reference to the ESP-ping (especially as it > appears in the milestones) ?
We currently have two different proposals for ESP-ping (draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping, and draft-antony-ipsecme-encrypted-esp-ping), and the WG has not decided if one or both of them will be useful. > 2) should there be a specific milestone on this kind of debugging > tool ? By reading this charter proposal, it appears that only > esp-ping is the WG choice. I did not want to put specific milestones as we do not know yet which protocols WG will start working on. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
