On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 07:58:24AM -0300, Soni "It/Its" L. wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2025-01-14 17:36, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > 
> > I don't think you need any IANA allocation or bits on the wire changes, I 
> > think you
> > should just *do it* and tell us.  If you need new IKEv2 Notifies, they are
> > easily acquired.
> 
> we might need an address family allocation? 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/address-family-numbers/address-family-numbers.xhtml
> 
> how do you do these for experiments?
>

I wouldn't worry about getting address families assignments.  The
primary use of address families in IETF stndards are for routing
(e.g., RIP, BGP-4, etc.).  As you might expect, the Sockets interface
is an API, and with a few exceptions the IETF doesn't standardize
API's.  AF_* assignments and IANA's address families appear to be
totally decoupled in any case.  For example, BSD and Linux define
AF_UNIX (aka AF_LOCAL in POSIX) to be 1, ad AF_INET is 2, with
BSD/Darwin assigning AF_INET6 to 30, and Linux using 10 for AF_INET6.

Meanwhile, in 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/address-family-numbers/address-family-numbers.xhtml:

0       Reserved                
1       IP (IP version 4)               
2       IP6 (IP version 6)

Cheers,

                                                - Ted

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to