The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9347, "Aggregation and Fragmentation Mode for Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Its Use for IP Traffic Flow Security (IP-TFS)".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8212 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Valery Smyslov <val...@smyslov.net> Section: 5.1 Original Text ------------- As the use of the AGGFRAG_PAYLOAD payload is currently only defined for non-transport-mode tunnels, the USE_AGGFRAG notification MUST NOT be combined with the USE_TRANSPORT notification. Corrected Text -------------- As the use of the AGGFRAG_PAYLOAD payload is currently only defined for non-transport-mode tunnels, the USE_AGGFRAG notification MUST NOT be combined with the USE_TRANSPORT_MODE notification. Notes ----- There is no "USE_TRANSPORT" notification in IKEv2. The correct name is "USE_TRANSPORT_MODE "(note, that in the other place of this Section the correct name was used). Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9347 (draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-19) -------------------------------------- Title : Aggregation and Fragmentation Mode for Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Its Use for IP Traffic Flow Security (IP-TFS) Publication Date : January 2023 Author(s) : C. Hopps Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Security Maintenance and Extensions Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
