Hi, On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 09:48:47AM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Nov 28, 2024, at 07:16, Valery Smyslov <smyslov.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > "Anti-Replay Protection (ARP)" transform type was originally named > > "Extended Sequence Numbers (ESN)" and was referenced by that name > > in a number of RFCs published prior to [RFCXXXX], which gave it > > the current title. > > > > Do you think this is not enough? > > It would be better in a separate RFC. But also I do not like the term “ARP”, > since in networking this acronym is well known for something completely > different. Maybe SNRP for “Serial Number Replay Protection”?
I also considered proposing other terms but decided against it when I noticed that "Anti-Replay" is used in the IPSec architecture document, RFC 4301. I also noticed until version -13 or -14 of this document it was called RP. -antony _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
