Your draft lists RFC 4739 (Multiple Authentication Exchanges in the Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) Protocol) as a normative reference but doesn't mention it anywhere in the body. In your presentation I'd like to hear advantages/disadvantages of your draft vs RFC 4739.
Thanks, Daniel > -----Original Message----- > From: Jun Hu (Nokia) <jun.hu=40nokia....@dmarc.ietf.org> > Sent: October 29, 2024 1:20 AM > To: Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi>; ipsec@ietf.org > Cc: yasufumi.morioka...@nttdocomo.com > Subject: [IPsec] Re: IPsecME agenda items for IETF #121 > > Hi, > We'd like to request a 10min slot for draft-hu-ipsecme-pqt-hybrid-auth, will > post an update before the meeting > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2024 6:07 PM > To: ipsec@ietf.org > Subject: [IPsec] IPsecME agenda items for IETF #121 > > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking > links or > opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. > > > > Send your requests for IPsecME agenda items as soon as possible, so we can > build an agenda for the meeting. Send requests to ipsecme-cha...@ietf.org. > -- > kivi...@iki.fi > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
