John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the document. Just one note: ### Section 1 I don't understand this sentence: When an IKEv2 peer is receiving additional Child SA's for a single set of Traffic Selectors than it is willing to create, it can return an error notify of TS_MAX_QUEUE. I think you mean something like this? NEW: When an IKEv2 peer is receiving more additional Child SA's for a single set of Traffic Selectors than it is willing to create, it can return an error notify of TS_MAX_QUEUE. (Added "more".) _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
