Thanks for adding the use cases section, it's useful to me.

In section 5, after adding the third scenario of not receiving the ESP Echo 
Reply packet, there are two points in the following paragraph that also need 
adjustments.
1. s/the sender can not distibguish those two scenarios/the sender can not 
distinguish those three scenarios.
2. The following sentence isn't correct as there are 3 possible situations.
   Therefore
   the sender SHOULD NOT treat lack of response as an indicator of end-
   to-end connectivity issues until an explicit confirmation of ESP Echo
   support by the peer is received.
Maybe change it to "Therefore the sender SHOULD NOT treat lack of response as 
an indicator of end-to-end connectivity issues" or "Therefore the sender SHOULD 
NOT treat lack of response as an indicator of end-to-end connectivity issues 
until it receives explicit confirmation that the peer supports and the 
intermediate nodes allow ESP Echo".

Regards & Thanks!
Wei PAN (潘伟)

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: IPsec <ipsec-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jen Linkova
    > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 6:59 AM
    > To: ipsec@ietf.org; Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>;
    > Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com>
    > Subject: [IPsec] Fwd: New Version Notification for
    > draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping-02.txt
    > 
    > We've just submitted -02 which should address comments raised during
    > the IPSECME session at IETF119.
    > 
    > Comments/suggestions?
    > 
    > 
    > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
    > From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
    > Date: Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:43 AM
    > Subject: New Version Notification for
    > draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping-02.txt
    > To: Jen Linkova <furr...@gmail.com>, Lorenzo Colitti
    > <lore...@google.com>, Michael Richardson
    > <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
    > 
    > 
    > A new version of Internet-Draft draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping-02.txt
    > has been successfully submitted by Jen Linkova and posted to the IETF
    > repository.
    > 
    > Name:     draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping
    > Revision: 02
    > Title:    ESP Echo Protocol
    > Date:     2024-04-04
    > Group:    Individual Submission
    > Pages:    8
    > URL:
    > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping-02.txt
    > Status:
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping/
    > HTML:
    > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping-02.html
    > HTMLized:
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping
    > Diff:
    > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping-
    > 02
    > 
    > Abstract:
    > 
    >    This document defines an ESP echo function which can be used to
    >    detect whether a given network path supports ESP packets.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > The IETF Secretariat
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > --
    > Cheers, Jen Linkova
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > IPsec mailing list
    > IPsec@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to