Hi Panos, thanks for addressing my comment. It looks good.
One nit. In the introduction, first paragraph, the last sentence seems to be broken: “This includes Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2, which the security is based on using the (EC)DH key exchange in the IKE_SA_INIT messages” By the way, I’m fine with not adding ML-KEM-512 to the document, but I won’t object either. Leonie Von: Kampanakis, Panos <kpa...@amazon.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2024 05:25 An: Bruckert, Leonie <leonie.bruck...@secunet.com>; ipsec@ietf.org Cc: Ravago, Gerardo <g...@amazon.com> Betreff: RE: [IPsec] Comment on draft-kampanakis-ml-kem-ikev2 Hi Leonie, I am circling back. I updated the terminology in the just submitted the -02 version. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-kampanakis-ml-kem-ikev2-02 Thank you for the suggestion about draft-ietf-pquip-pqt-hybrid-terminology. Hopefully IPSECME will discuss this draft in Brisbane. From: IPsec <ipsec-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Bruckert, Leonie Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 6:40 AM To: ipsec@ietf.org<mailto:ipsec@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [IPsec] Comment on draft-kampanakis-ml-kem-ikev2 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks for setting up this draft! Have you considered to align terminology with draft-ietf-pquip-pqt-hybrid-terminology? It defines a “PQ/T Hybrid Key Encapsulation Mechanism” as a “multi-algorithm KEM made up of two or more component KEM algorithms where at least one is a post-quantum algorithm and at least one is a traditional algorithm“. This definition may not perfectly match how a hybrid KEM is done in IKEv2 as it is a sequential approach. However, I think it would be good to have a reference to the terminology draft. Leonie
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
