Hi,

> > Hi IPSECME,
> >
> > RFC 4302 (ESP) says "if an SA establishment protocol such as IKE is 
> > employed, the receiver SHOULD
> notify the sender, during SA establishment, if the
> > receiver will not provide anti-replay protection".
> >
> > I haven't been able to find any mechanism for this in IKEv2 (or IKEv1).  Is 
> > there a way to do this?  Or is
> this a mismatch between ESP and IKEv2?

In IPsec the replay protection is a local matter of receiver, 
the sender must always increment the Sequence Number as if 
the replay protection is always on.

> Indeed, I don't see it for IKEv2 either. Funny enough there is
> IPSEC_REPLAY_COUNTER_SYNC_SUPPORTED for RFC 6311.

That is for different purpose :-)

> For IKEv1 I do see 24577 REPLAY-STATUS, referencing RFC 2407,
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2407.html#section-4.6.3.2
> 
> So this was just never ported up to IKEv2 it seems.
> 
> At $dayjob, we would call this an "easy onboarding task" :)
> 
> Probably worth writing up a 3 page IKEv2 notification status payload for.

Another approach would be to generalize the Transform Type 5
as the way to control the replay protection status
(see draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-07, Section 2.6.)

Regards,
Valery.

> Paul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to