I'm interested and would attend.
Thanks, Chris. Steffen Klassert <steffen.klass...@secunet.com> writes:
Hi, over the last years, quite some work was done from different parties to overcome some limitations of ESP to handle parallel datapaths, QoS classes etc. Chronologically ordered, we have: November 2019: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mglt-ipsecme-multiple-child-sa-00 That was replaced in November 2020 by: htpps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pwouters-multi-sa-performance/ At IETF 108 in July 2020 there was this proposal: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/materials/slides-108-ipsecme-proposed-improvements-to-esp-01 October 2022: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ponchon-ipsecme-anti-replay-subspaces-00.txt Aditionally, Google published the PSP Security Protocol (PSP) for datacenters in April 2022: https://github.com/google/psp All these proposals try to solve related problems in different ways. They all have pros and cons, but the number of proposals shows that there is a real need to solve these problems better sooner than later. So instead of creating even more proposals, we maybe should take a step back and try to do a clear problem statement. Based on that we then can rethink about possible solutions. The next possibiltiy to sit together for an 'in person' discussion would be at the IETF Meeting in London. Is there anyone interested in a sidemeeting about that topic? Steffen _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
