Hi Zahed,
please see inline... Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sar...@ericsson.com> writes:
-----Original Message----- From: iesg <iesg-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Christian Hopps Sent: den 25 augusti 2022 15:43 To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sar...@ericsson.com> Cc: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ipsecme-ip...@ietf.org; ipsecme-cha...@ietf.org; ipsec@ietf.org; kivi...@iki.fi Subject: Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Hi Zaheduzzaman, [inline] Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> writes:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
...
I am also supporting Lars's discuss on 3.1 ECN support.This 2nd paragraph was added to satisfy this DISCUSS, please see the latest version: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-17#section-3.1 I believe we will discussing those proposals, if they are good enough. Lets continue the discussion in Lars's discuss thread.
Lars has already replied in the affirmative:
We have a couple more ADs with ECN as a DISCUSS: - Lars - You wanted us to be explicit about what to do with ECN field based on RFC6040. The propsed text above satisfies this requirement I beleive. Agreed?yes, possibly with the addition Martin later suggested ("unless all inner packets have the same marking"). Thanks, Lars
//Zahed
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
