On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 3:44 PM Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> wrote: [...]
Thanks for your feedback Tero. I have resolved all the errata that were mentioned and agreed in our discussions. > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6339 > > > > There are two issues here. One is a bad test vector. I think they > > are likely right, but have no easy way to verify this. > > The second issue is about clarifying endianness. This should prob > > be split into a seperate errata and then approved ? > > No idea about this one. > I have split this errata into two to separate the issues, but also left them in Reported state. This means that for IPsec, we currently only have 3 open errata's left: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6339 A bad test vector that we need to verify https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6931 The endianness issue originally included in 6339 https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4709 ASN.1 proposed fixes for RFC 4301 If anyone can help with these, please speak up :) Paul
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
