Hi Thanks for the comments and feedback. I have uploaded versions to address the comments on both the YANG and corresponding MIB document.
Don -----Original Message----- From: Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2021 9:32 AM To: Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> Cc: Don Fedyk <dfe...@labn.net>; ipsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [IPsec] IP-TFS YANG and MIB Updated Christian Hopps writes: > > Or if it is other way then add text saying "If this is true then > > inner packets that are larger than what can be tranmitted in outer > > packets will be dropped.". > > "Disable packet fragmentation across consecutive iptfs tunnel packets; > inner packets larger than what can be transmitted in outer packets > will be dropped."; That is good. > >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-01.t > >> xt > > > > Same changes than in Yang document is needed here too. > > > > Also remove the last sentence of the abstract, i.e. I do not think > > there is no need to say "This is an unpublished work in progress.", > > in internet drafts, as they are working documents anyways... As I sent already in my private email the mib document also needs the IANA considerations section and splitting references to normative and informative. And the Security Considerations section of MIB document needs to use the MIB security considerations boilerplate as described in https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/mib-security page. (Just repeating these important points here so they do not get lost, as I earlier only sent them to authors). -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
