Hi Michael, > I have reviewed the diff at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc8229&url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme- > rfc8229bis-01 > > and the update seems like a good job to me.
Thanks. > I wonder about keeping more of the original authors on the new document, > since it is substantively the same document. I can not judge what their > contribution was to the original document, nor do I know if they were asked. > If the design team has gone through this consideration, then that's enough > for me. All three original authors were asked to co-author the draft. Tommy agreed, but no reply was received from Samy and Ravi. I cannot judge their contribution to the original rfc, but I think that it's a good idea to add them to acknowledgement section anyway. Will do this. Regards, Valery. > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
