OK, this is ridiculous. "non-inclusive behaviour"? Bullying? Gimme
a break.
If the editor of a draft in an IETF WG blocks legitimate email
concerning the draft then perhaps the editor of the draft shouldn't
be editor of the draft anymore.
I'll volunteer to take over this draft. I don't block anyone and
will tolerate all sorts of inclusive or non-inclusive behavior.
Dan.
On 5/5/21 8:08 PM, PMDF Internet Messaging wrote:
This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
Message-id: <6297c870-0507-b3e8-ee6e-5517bdc86...@lounge.org>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 20:08:35 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dhark...@lounge.org>
To: Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca>, ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-00.txt
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
Recipient address: p...@nohats.ca
Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 <dhark...@lounge.org>: Sender address
rejected: Refusing email from Dan Harkins for repeated bullying and non-inclusive
behaviour
Remote system: dns;mx.nohats.ca (TCP|198.137.202.94|47303|193.110.157.68|25)
(mx.nohats.ca ESMTP Postfix)
--
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
