Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> wrote:
> This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document ending
> 2021-03-22. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting
> this document as WG document to this list.I support adoption. I am frustrated with the WG because we've been talking about this for at least two years (maybe four?): documents don't need to be perfect to be adopted. So, just do it already. Please plan to WGLC this before the next IETF. I'd *like* section 3 to enumerate the claims clearer (Maybe just new paragraphs). Pretty much each sentence is a claim, and I think that they should point to references. That will make it much more impactful a document in my opinion. But, I'd rather publish it if adding such references is hard. I think that the third paragraph (labelled IPsec) should be a new section 3.1. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
