On Mon, 8 Mar 2021, Tero Kivinen wrote:
Subject: [IPsec] WG Adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipsecme-mib-iptfs
This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document ending
2021-03-22. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting
this document as WG document to this list.
This is part of the Traffic Flow Confidentiality work in the charter.
I am fine with adoption.
I would use "Bytes" instead of "Octects" for the byte counters. And I
don't see any idletime counters? There are usually also soft and hard
limits which I don't see support for here? Either add those, or clarify
what values are expected if your implemention supports soft/hard limits.
Paul
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
