Christian Hopps writes:
> Just to clarify, are you indicating Valery's changes should be made?
> If so then I will update the document so we can continue to make
> progress. 

I have not checked out the draft yet, so I do not have opinion about
this. I was just pointing out that this is good time to do the change,
if those are needed, this is not too late...

And, yes I would think it would be worth of getting other people to
say their opinions too before doing too much work.

Sometimes having clear layers makes things easier, I think for example
having separate intermediate exchange instead of having that same
exchange buried inside the post quantum draft makes it easier to
understand how it works. Not sure if that is true in this case.
-- 
kivi...@iki.fi

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to