Hi, > On Tue, 19 May 2020, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > >> Can the WG chairs or AD see about getting this unstuck and out the > door? > > > > There's a giant backlog in the "RFC-EDITOR" state (see > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/current_queue.php); my understanding is > that > > this accumulated in the gap period between Heather and John, and > there's > > not really a way to make the overall queue move faster. > > Oh, I see.
Ben, thank you for the explanation. The draft has already endured unfortunate delay in the WG, this one is just another unfortunate one. That is that. > > It is possible for > > the IESG to request expedited processing of a specific document, if > needed > > -- is there a timely need for an RFC number for this document that we > > should do so? > > Ahh, no there is no reason for an expedited processing. I agree with Paul (with co-author hat on). The code-points are already allocated and several vendors have implemented the draft. The only thing left is an RFC number to refer to, but we can wait for it. Regards, Valery. > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
