Does IPsec not also include AH as an option still ?

On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 09:02:12AM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > > draft-ietf-taps-transport-security is currently in IESG evaluation, and in
> > > its description of IKEv2 with ESP it asserts that "IKEv2 [RFC7296] and ESP
> > > [RFC4303] together form the modern IPsec protocol suite that encrypts
> > and
> > > authenticates IP packets, either for creating tunnels (tunnel-mode) or for
> > > direct transport connections (transport-mode)."
> > > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11#section-
> > 3.4.1).
> > > I don't think I see a problem with that description, but wanted to run it
> > > by the WG for a quick sanity check before the document gets approved, in
> > > case there's something I'm forgetting.
> > 
> > Looks correct and appropriate to me.
> 
> I concur. 
> 
> However, I'd suggest changing the title of the section from "IKEv2 with ESP" 
> to "IPsec".
> 
> Regards,
> Valery.
> 
> > Paul
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > IPsec mailing list
> > IPsec@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to