I think it would be useful to have a virtual interim to go over the changes made and yet to be made in the IPTFS work. We have an open issue on transport mode support that might benefit from a live discussion.
Thanks, Chris. > On Mar 20, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all. > > As you know, the in-person IETF meeting in Vancouver has been cancelled. > There is a reduced schedule for virtual meetings [1], but it does not include > IPsecME. The IESG chair has published a recommended schedule [2] for the > working groups to hold virtual meetings in April instead of the physical > session in Vancouver. For IPsecME, the chosen date is Wednesday, April 8th, > but we are free to choose to meet at that date at whatever time is > convenient, or we may choose a different date in May, or we may skip the > meeting altogether if we don’t believe there is added value in holding a > virtual meeting over just using email. > > > Please note that virtual meetings are pretty poor for status and progress > reports. They are functional for specific discussion and for making decisions. > > So, if you are interested in holding a meeting, please reply to this with > three pieces of information: > > • Work item you would like to discuss online, for example: the traffic > flow security draft (possible to have more than 1) > • A thing you think requires discussion online that doesn’t seem to get > settled in email (example: which protocol number to use) > • Preferred time of day for the interim meeting (please state that in > UTC to avoid confusion) > Thanks, > > Tero & Yoav > > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/107/agenda > > [2] > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/wgchairs/raw-attachment/wiki/WikiStart/April2020-RecommendedSchedule.pdf > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
