Paul Hoffman writes: > On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > > A general comment: I think we already decided in the WG that we will > > go with the tcp approach, not with this fragmentation layer in the > > IKEv2. Why do we have this document here? > We don't. Documents listed as "Related Documents" on the Datatracker > page are just that: related. They are not WG work items.
Ah, I misremembered in the plane then when I was reading this. I tought this was on the agenda for the ipsecme meeting on monday... On the other hand the ikev3 draft was not listed in the related documents, as it does not have -ipsecme- in its name, which caused that my sec-area WG ebook containing all WG and WG related drafts and RFC did not include it... Need to read it now... -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
