On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Mark Boltz wrote: > Interesting. I always considered the requirement of a trust relationship of > some kind an inherent part of "VPN" (of any kind, SSL, IPsec or otherwise), > and assumed most people did.
Mark, meet Michael Richardson and friends. :-) > In no part is trust suggested or otherwise in the Latin "ad hoc", so it is > technically an incorrect expectation. > > But if the group feels that somehow the simplest correct term is too > confusing we can try for something else. :-) See earlier in this thread on opportunistic VPNs, which this is not. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
