On 11/1/11 7:51 PM, "Keith Welter" <welt...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>Having been working for the same vendor for 10 years, I've gotten used to >> our marketing jargon. Anyway, I'd like to have some short term for the >> set of addresses that are behind a certain gateway", or "the set of >> addresses that you can reach through a tunnel to gateway x". I'm used to >> calling that "x's encryption domain", but I'm open to suggestions for a >> new catchy term. >> >Some ideas: >1) "IPsec protected destinations" >2) "IPsec protection domain" I like having the verb "protect" there because it echos the processing choice from RFC 4301. If nobody objects, I'll use "protected domain" in the next iteration of the draft. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
