Julien tells me that no one has responded to them. Is there no one here interested in PFKEY any more?
--Paul Hoffman At 9:40 AM -0700 10/20/10, Laganier, Julien wrote: >Folks, > >We are trying to get this PF_KEY extension document published as an >Informational RFC and it would be beneficial if some IPsec experts on this >list could help us by reviewing the document. > >Please let me know if you are willing to review the document. > >Thanks. > >--julien > > >PF_KEY Extension as an Interface between Mobile IPv6 and IPsec/IKE > draft-ebalard-mext-pfkey-enhanced-migrate-01 > >Abstract > > This document describes the need for an interface between Mobile IPv6 > and IPsec/IKE and shows how the two protocols can interwork. An > extension of the PF_KEY framework is proposed which allows smooth and > solid operation of IPsec/IKE in a Mobile IPv6 environment. > > PF_KEY MIGRATE message serves as a carrier for updated information > for both the in-kernel IPsec structures (Security Policy Database / > Security Association Database) and those maintained by the key > managers. This includes in-kernel Security Policy / Security > Association endpoints, key manager maintained equivalents, and > addresses used by IKE_SA (current and to be negotiated). The > extension is helpful for assuring smooth interworking between Mobile > IPv6 and IPsec/IKE for the bootstrapping of mobile nodes and their > movements. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
