On Tue, March 23, 2010 11:46 pm, Dan Harkins wrote: > Of course it's not the only reason. But you're missing the point. The > point is that the reason doesn't matter! You want to describe a particular > reason-- the "master" crashed and all state went over to the "hot > standby"-- > not the generic concept of state moving.
Yes, I think this is my issue with the choice of "hot standby," as well - there's an implication that they're not sharing state and that failing over looks from the outside like a reboot. Melinda _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
