Valery Smyslov wrote: > And I want to raise one more issue. Section 4 mandates support > for both PKIX and preshared key for conformant implementation. > Isnt't it too strong requirement? <snip>
This requirement has been in the document for 4+ years. Unless there is concrete evidence of multiple implementors encountering difficulties with it (and not just hypothetical garage door openers), I would propose *not* re-visiting this topic at this time. Best regards, Pasi (not wearing any hats) _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
